Not even that. If he is so blind to the scientific data, maybe he's in the wrong field altogether and if he's that ethically deficient, he has some serious soul-searching to do. Best go to a remote cave and spend some time thinking about existence and authoritarianism, Neil.
The idea that the "vaccine" is somehow effective at preventing death and serious disease from befalling those who are vaccinated and then infected is ludicrous. The entire mechanism of the "vaccine" was to bind to the spike protein and prevent cells from being infected. We know that the mutations prevented that from happening because the viral load in the vaccinated and infected are just as high as in the virus naive. If the vaccine cannot prevent infection of cells by what precise mechanism is it somehow standing in the way of serious illness or death?
The answer of course is it is not doing anything like reducing serious illness or death as that is a function of the viral mutations leaning toward being less deadly though even that is questionable as it is clear in the early stages of the pandemic what was leading to most deaths was denial of medical treatment of concurrent bacterial infections.
If the vaccine had worked to prevent serious illness and death, we would have had declining numbers of the serious illness and deaths and it is a fact that more people have died since the introduction of the vaccines than died in the time period when the vaccine was not available.
I read so much I can't remember because it was in someone sub stack, sorry I just found it interesting. Research it yourself like I found it. Lots of controlled opposition out there, you got to know how to recognize it.
When I listened to the interview on PBD podcast I didn’t know who Neil deGrasse Tyson was and thought he was just an obnoxious ignorant buffoon.
He should stick to astrophysics.
I bet he's actually shit at that and is just promoted by the powers that shouldn't be because of his skin color.
Not even that. If he is so blind to the scientific data, maybe he's in the wrong field altogether and if he's that ethically deficient, he has some serious soul-searching to do. Best go to a remote cave and spend some time thinking about existence and authoritarianism, Neil.
The idea that the "vaccine" is somehow effective at preventing death and serious disease from befalling those who are vaccinated and then infected is ludicrous. The entire mechanism of the "vaccine" was to bind to the spike protein and prevent cells from being infected. We know that the mutations prevented that from happening because the viral load in the vaccinated and infected are just as high as in the virus naive. If the vaccine cannot prevent infection of cells by what precise mechanism is it somehow standing in the way of serious illness or death?
The answer of course is it is not doing anything like reducing serious illness or death as that is a function of the viral mutations leaning toward being less deadly though even that is questionable as it is clear in the early stages of the pandemic what was leading to most deaths was denial of medical treatment of concurrent bacterial infections.
If the vaccine had worked to prevent serious illness and death, we would have had declining numbers of the serious illness and deaths and it is a fact that more people have died since the introduction of the vaccines than died in the time period when the vaccine was not available.
I don't think I have seen this point more ably put than this. Thank you, Mr. Dirt. Your comment is worth passing on to many.
lol, unicorns.
I've read that Del is controlled opposition along with Alex Jones and lots of others. Could it be true? Just saying.
Please show us where this was put into print.
I read so much I can't remember because it was in someone sub stack, sorry I just found it interesting. Research it yourself like I found it. Lots of controlled opposition out there, you got to know how to recognize it.
Thanks hun thought you might save me a minute or two from the search 😉
Doubtful. This "controlled opposition" stuff mainly serves to fracture people on this side of the debate.
What do you think?
Or do you need to be told what to think?
Like many.
Good work, thanks!
Is Neil just ignorant, or is he just another lying tool of BIG PHARMA?